Innovative technologies for carbon capture in cement industry

Dr S B Hegde
Professor, Jain University and Visiting Professor, Pennsylvania State University, USA

As the world continues to grapple with the challenges of climate change, industries across the globe are being urged to adopt sustainable practices to mitigate their environmental impact. Among these industries, the cement sector stands out as a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, particularly due to the carbon dioxide (CO₂) released during cement production. In the pursuit of a more sustainable future, the development and implementation of carbon capture technologies in the cement industry have emerged as a crucial area of focus.

Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies offer immense potential to drastically reduce CO₂ emissions, while simultaneously maintaining the critical role of cement in construction and infrastructure development. By capturing and storing carbon dioxide, these technologies provide an opportunity to decarbonize the cement industry and foster a more sustainable and climate-resilient future.

This article delves into the world of carbon capture technologies specifically tailored for the cement industry. We will explore a range of innovative approaches that hold promise for significantly reducing carbon emissions, providing insights into their mechanisms, benefits, and challenges.

From the application of oxy-fuel combustion and precalciner technologies to the utilization of alternative fuels and the development of carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems, we will examine the diverse array of solutions being researched and implemented to curb carbon emissions in cement production. An attempt also has been made to look into the intricacies of each approach, highlighting their potential to transform the industry's sustainability practices.

Furthermore, an effort has been put into think of the economic viability of these technologies, analysing their cost-effectiveness and potential barriers to large-scale implementation. By examining the technical and economic aspects, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of the feasibility and scalability of these carbon capture solutions, paving the way for a successful transition towards a low-carbon cement industry.

As governments, stakeholders, and environmental organizations increasingly call for robust measures to combat climate change, the cement industry finds itself at a pivotal moment. By embracing innovative carbon capture technologies, cement producers can not only meet stringent emission reduction targets but also demonstrate their commitment to a sustainable future.

Ultimately, this exploration of various technologies for carbon capture in the cement industry aims to shed light on the transformative potential they hold. By fostering awareness and understanding of these innovative approaches, we hope to inspire accelerated action and collaboration among industry leaders, researchers, and policymakers to build a greener and more sustainable future for cement production.

Innovative technologies

This article explores a range of cutting-edge approaches designed to reduce carbon emissions and revolutionize the cement manufacturing process.

Oxy-fuel combustion: One of the leading technologies for carbon capture in the cement industry is oxy-fuel combustion. This method involves using oxygen instead of air during the cement kiln combustion process, resulting in a flue gas stream consisting mainly of CO₂. This concentrated CO₂ stream can then be captured, compressed, and stored or utilized in various applications, preventing its release into the atmosphere. Oxy-fuel combustion shows promise in significantly reducing emissions, while also improving energy efficiency and product quality.

Precalciner technologies: Precalciner technologies involve introducing calcined raw materials into the cement production process, which reduces the carbon intensity of the final product. These technologies leverage the use of alternative fuels and mineralizers, which not only lower CO₂ emissions but also enhance the sustainability of cement manufacturing. By optimizing the precalciner design and operation, cement plants can achieve substantial carbon reductions without compromising product performance or production capacity.

Alternative fuels: Incorporating alternative fuels into the cement production process is another key strategy for carbon capture. Instead of relying solely on traditional fossil fuels, such as coal, cement plants are increasingly turning to renewable and low-carbon alternatives, including biomass, waste-derived fuels, and even non-recyclable plastics. By utilizing these fuels, carbon emissions can be significantly reduced, and valuable waste materials can be diverted from landfills, contributing to a circular economy.

CCS systems: Carbon capture and storage systems are pivotal in the endeavour to curb carbon emissions in the cement industry. CCS involves capturing CO₂ from cement production, compressing it, and safely storing it underground, preventing its release into the atmosphere. This technology not only reduces carbon emissions but also holds the potential for carbon utilization, where CO₂ can be transformed into valuable products, such as construction materials. Despite facing challenges related to cost and infrastructure, CCS systems have the capacity to make substantial contributions to a low-carbon cement industry.

Collaboration and research: Advancing sustainability in the cement industry requires collaborative efforts between cement manufacturers, researchers, policymakers, and stakeholders. It is crucial to continue investing in research and development to enhance
existing carbon capture technologies and explore novel approaches. Additionally, governments can play a vital role by incentivizing the adoption of sustainable practices and providing support for the deployment of carbon capture solutions.

Economic viability of carbon capture technologies in cement industry

Implementing carbon capture technologies in the cement industry involves not only technical considerations but also economic factors that determine the feasibility and scalability of these solutions. Understanding the cost-effectiveness and potential barriers is crucial for a successful transition to a low-carbon cement industry. Let's examine the economic viability of various carbon capture technologies:

Oxy-fuel combustion: While oxy-fuel combustion has the potential to significantly reduce carbon emissions, it comes with higher capital and operational costs compared to conventional cement production processes. The need for oxygen supply, changes in infrastructure, and the energy requirements for the separation and compression of captured CO₂ can contribute to increased costs. However, advancements in technology and economies of scale can help reduce these costs over time. Additionally, revenue streams from the sale or utilization of captured CO₂ can offset some expenses, improving the economic viability of oxy-fuel combustion.

Precalciner technologies: Precalciner technologies offer a more cost-effective approach to carbon capture in the cement industry. By incorporating alternative fuels and mineralizers, cement plants can achieve significant emission reductions without major modifications to existing infrastructure. The use of alternative fuels such as biomass or waste-derived fuels can sometimes even result in cost savings compared to traditional fossil fuels. However, the availability and cost of these alternative fuels can vary regionally, posing challenges to widespread adoption.

Alternative fuels: The utilization of alternative fuels can contribute to the economic viability of carbon capture in the cement industry. In addition to their environmental benefits, alternative fuels, such as biomass or waste-derived fuels, can often be procured at lower costs compared to fossil fuels. Moreover, the diversion of waste materials from landfills reduces disposal costs for waste generators. However, challenges related to fuel supply chain logistics, regulatory compliance, and plant modifications may arise, affecting the overall economic feasibility.

CCS systems: The economic viability of CCS systems for carbon capture in the cement industry depends on several factors. The capital costs associated with capturing, compressing, and storing CO₂ can be significant, especially for retrofitting existing cement plants. Infrastructure requirements such as pipelines and storage sites also add to the overall costs. However, revenue streams from the sale of captured CO₂ for enhanced oil recovery or utilization in other industrial processes can provide economic incentives for CCS implementation. Additionally, supportive policies, such as carbon pricing mechanisms or financial incentives, can play a vital role in improving the cost-effectiveness of CCS systems.

Potential barriers to large-scale implementation

High capital costs: The initial investment required to implement carbon capture technologies can be a significant barrier to large-scale adoption. Cement plants often face financial constraints and may find it challenging to allocate substantial resources for technology upgrades or retrofitting.

Energy requirements: Carbon capture processes can be energy-intensive, requiring additional power for the separation, compression, and storage of CO₂. The increased energy demand can impact the overall energy efficiency of cement plants and result in higher operational costs.

Availability of infrastructure: Establishing the necessary infrastructure for carbon capture such as CO2 pipelines and storage sites can pose challenges. The availability of suitable storage locations and the associated transportation infrastructure can impact the feasibility of large-scale implementation.

Policy and regulatory environment: A supportive policy framework, including carbon pricing mechanisms and financial incentives, is crucial to incentivize cement producers to invest in carbon capture technologies. Uncertain or unfavourable policies may hinder the economic viability of these solutions.

Market demand and CO₂ utilization: The economic feasibility of carbon capture technologies can be influenced by the demand for captured CO₂ and its utilization potential. Identifying viable markets for captured CO₂ and developing technologies to convert it into valuable products or achieve carbon utilization are essential for maximizing the economic benefits.

Necessity of Union Government intervention

The Government of India should consider providing subsidies and support to cement companies to implement carbon capture technologies for several compelling reasons.

The cement industry is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for approximately 8% of global CO₂ emissions. By incentivizing the adoption of carbon capture technologies, the government can contribute to the nation's climate change mitigation efforts. Supporting the cement industry in reducing its carbon footprint aligns with India's commitment to the Paris Agreement and its national climate goals.

The adoption of carbon capture technologies in the cement sector aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly Goal 13 (Climate Action) and Goal 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure). Subsidies can encourage cement companies to invest in sustainable technologies, helping India progress towards achieving these goals.

Providing subsidies to cement companies for implementing carbon capture technologies can drive innovation and technological advancements in the industry. This support can enable research and development efforts to optimize capture processes, enhance energy efficiency, and reduce the costs associated with carbon capture. It can foster the development of indigenous expertise and promote India as a leader in sustainable cement production technologies.

The adoption of carbon capture technologies can offer long-term economic benefits to the cement industry and the country as a whole. While the initial capital costs may be high, subsidies can help alleviate financial barriers and encourage cement companies to invest in these technologies. Additionally, the development of a robust carbon capture sector can create new employment opportunities, promote technological exports, and enhance the competitiveness of Indian cement companies in the global market.

Subsidies for carbon capture technologies send a strong policy signal that the government is committed to transitioning the cement industry towards sustainable practices. This can encourage private sector investments, attract international collaborations, and spur market transformation. By providing support, the government can accelerate the deployment of carbon capture technologies, establishing a pathway for a low-carbon cement industry in India.

Cement production is associated with various air pollutants, including particulate matter, sulphur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides. The implementation of carbon capture technologies can contribute to improved air quality by reducing the release of these pollutants. This can have significant health benefits, reducing respiratory ailments and enhancing the overall well-being of communities living near cement plants.

Conclusions

As the demand for cement continues to rise, the cement industry must embrace innovative technologies for carbon capture to mitigate its environmental impact. Through oxy-fuel combustion, precalciner technologies, alternative fuels, and carbon capture and storage systems, significant progress can be made in reducing carbon emissions and advancing sustainability. By fostering collaboration, investing in research, and promoting supportive policies, the cement industry has the opportunity to lead the way towards a greener future, where construction and infrastructure development can coexist harmoniously with environmental stewardship. Embracing these innovative technologies not only benefits the industry but also contributes to global efforts in combatting climate change and creating a more sustainable world for future generations.

In nut shell, providing subsidies to cement companies to implement carbon capture technologies aligns with India's climate goals, supports sustainable development, drives technological innovation, offers economic benefits, sends a strong policy signal, and improves air quality. By supporting the transition to a low-carbon cement industry, the government can contribute to both environmental and socio-economic objectives, fostering a sustainable and resilient future for India.

References

1. Sui, T., & Huang, J. (2020). A review of carbon capture in the cement industry. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(5), 77. doi: 10.1007/s11783-020-1284-9.
2. Khan, M. I., & Sui, T. (2021). Techno-economic analysis of carbon capture retrofit in cement plants: A case study of South Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 284, 125395. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125395.
3. Gartner, E. M., & Macphee, D. E. (2011). Feasibility and economics of CO₂capture from cement kilns. Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geologic Formations – Results from the CO₂Capture Project, 4, 203-211.
4. Leibbrandt, N., Gibbins, J., & Catenacci, M. (2016). The role of CO₂capture and storage in mitigating climate change: Insights from integrated assessment modelling. Energy Procedia, 114, 7029-7035. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1765.
5. European Cement Research Academy (ECRA). (2017). Carbon Capture in the Cement Industry: Technologies, Progress, and Retrofitting. Retrieved from https://www.ecra-online.org/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/ECRA_CC_Brochure_2017_English_web.pdf.
6. Keating, J., Sjöström, J., & Zondervan, E. (2018). The costs of carbon capture and storage for Norway and Europe. Energy Policy, 115, 603-612. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.006.
7. Hasanbeigi, A., & Price, L. (2018). Alternative control techniques and their costs for reducing carbon dioxide emissions from cement production. Energy Policy, 114, 467-474. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.005.
8. Bruant, R. G., Frías, M., van Riessen, A., & Saqan, E. (2018). Carbon capture, utilization and storage: A review focused on the cement industry. Journal of CO₂Utilization, 25, 252-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2018.02.018.
9. Global Cement and Concrete Association (GCCA). (2021). Cement and Concrete Industry Roadmap to Carbon Neutrality. Retrieved from https://gccassociation.org/media/2959/gcca-cement-and-concrete-industry-roadmap-to-carbon-neutrality.pdf.
10. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2020). Technology Roadmap: Low-Carbon Transition in the Cement Industry. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/technology-roadmap-low-carbon-transition-in-the-cement-industry.

Hits: 0